The T Statistic

BackgroundThe decreasing score of students in standardized try ons in math and skill pass on been a front for concern for just about education reformers hence , intensive remedy had been designed for those who give up been found to fulfill poorly at these ladders . In to discharge whether the intervention programs be effective , stacks in the previous(prenominal) interrogatorys in the lead the remediation was habituated will be compared to test heaps aft(prenominal) the remediationStatement of the problemIs in that location a square inequality in the test scores of students before and after the remediation program p free-living variableRemediation programDependent variableTest scores (before and after remediationHypothesisNull clay : in that location is no substantive distinction in the test scores of st udents before and after the remediation programAlternative speculation : There is a significant struggle in the test scores of students before and after the remediation programEffect surfaceThe effect surface would hint the magnitude of the release of the scores , using Cohen s (1988 ) conventional system , an effect size of .02 is small .05 is chastise and .08 is large . The probability nourish would that tell us whether to reject of immerse the null assumption but in no re exhibitation tells us whether the difference is small or largeStatistics t 5 .192df 214n 216Effect size .05ReportThe answered question question is Is there a significant difference between the test scores of students in cognition and math before and after the remediation program The supposal tested is as followsHo :0Ha :? 0The result of the t-test on student scores in the science and math test (t 5 .192 at .

05 ) which is larger than the t-critical value (p 4 .33 with a sample size of 216 and a degrees of independence of 214 . Therefore the null hypothesis is jilted and the alternative hypothesis is accepted thus , the remediation programs have indeed statistically increased the test scores of the students in science and math . The effect size is at .05 which is gibe (Cohen , 1988 , this would indicate that the difference in the before and after test scores is moderate in value and hence is non really that large as expected . This would mean that the present remediation program has do its work but oftentimes is desired before it could be said that it has really reached its objectiveReferencesCohen , J (1988 . Statistical Power epitome for the Behavioral Sciences . New York : AcademicPressCohen , B (2001 . Explaining Psychological Statistics . New York : WileyMoore , D .S (2000 . The Basic Practice of Statistics second ed . New York W .H . Freeman...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper