Critique of Research Article Essay Essay

The function of this essay is to recognize specific aspects of the clinical nursing research paper done by Carlee Lehna and Jack McNeil. I will define and discuss these aspects. In clinical research articles there are literature reviews that give background information as to the difficulty and research that was performed in the study, and why this problem needed to be canvas (Burnes & Grove, 2011).The literature review in this particular study explains to the reader round the contrast in health literacy of side of meat language all parents and Spanish oral presentation only parents and what tools the researchers used to musical rhythm the parents health literacy of their childs health care. The review was very thorough and understandable. The authors named a couple of diametric tools and how those tools measured literacy. They also explain why they chose the Test of Functional health Literacy in Adults tool (TOFHLA), it was the only judge that was available in English a nd Spanish.After reading another article there is another test called Newest Vital Sign. This test is also in English and Spanish takes little time and has only six questions. (Cornett, 2009). Using one test to measure their healt literacy is a limitation. The problem statement helps the reader identify the dilemma for the scrape tribe in the research and why it needs further exploration. burn & McNeil discuss that the beginninger health literacy of the parents the poorer outcomes of their children (Lehna & McNeil, 2008). The purpose of this study is to measure the residuum in health literacy in two groups of different language speaking parents, i.e. English and Spanish (Lehna & McNeil, 2008). The relationship between the problem statement and purpose statement is that the purpose statement is the how the authors are going to find the refer for the problem. The problem statement in this article very clear that the low health literacy is directly related to poor outcomes. The p urpose statement is succinct and easy to comprehend. In the Lehna & McNeil article, the word purpose is mentioned several times and it whitethorn make it harder for the reader to decipher the purpose statement, this is a limitation.Target population is a larger total consume group that meets a criteria (Burnes & Grove, 2011). test is the particular group that participated in the study (Burnes & Grove, 2011). The target group in this particular study meet the criteria of parents/caregivers that either only speak English or Spanish and that their children were treated at Shriners Hospital for Children in Galveston, Texas. The sample group is much smaller, they meet the criteria and participated in the tests, interviews and focus groups.These different ways that the researchers used to gather information is a strength. Two of the limitations with the sample is that they only studied parents from one hospital and the authors just specified the language as Spanish, there are many dif ferent dialects in those Spanish speaking countries that some information could be lost in translation. The five move of the study were very easy to recognize. By dissecting this study it helped me identify and apprize those 5 parts. I feel a bit more homy in reading research papers.This research study was very elicit because I can relate to the difficulty with trying to explain health issues with Spanish speaking families. References Burnes, N. , & Grove, S. K. (2011). Understanding Nursing Research Building an Evidence-Based drill (5th Ed. ). Maryland Heights, MO Elsevier. Cornett, S. (2009, Sept 30). Assessing and Addressing Health Literacy. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 14. http//dx. doi. org/10. 3912/OJIN. Vol14No03Man02 Lehna, C. , & McNeil, J. (2008, April 2). Mixed-Method geographic expedition of Parents Health Understanding. Clinical Nursing Research, http//cnr. sagepub. com/