The Negatives Of Genetic Engineering

The term genic engineering science was first coined by varlet Williamson in is science fiction fresh Dragons Island, published in 1 951 , i yr before Donas role in heredity was confirmed by Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase, and two geezerhood before James Watson and Francis Crick showed that the deoxyribonucleic acid molecule has a double-helix structure, DNA stands for (desorbing cultic acid). For more years, there has been a controversy skirt the goodity of genetic modifying organisms.Some its unethical since it whitethorn lead to side effects such(prenominal) as mutation, opposites assign its totally agreeable since it can make a stronger healthier and smarter organism. I tryingly believe that genetic engineering should be banned for multiple reasons such as religion, morals, physical attri justes and crossing species boundaries. In ein truth country there is incompatible religions and these religions have various views. One of these views be on genetic engine ering, whether it is acceptable or non modifying genes.God created us human not perfect so why do we indispensability to reach perfection when it is not a human trait. Other tribe who lack faith will publish you humanness seek perfection its in their nature so its k modifying genes, but if we reached perfection what do we have to seek, we tinny be perfect and lose our pinch of humanity. Is genetic engineering ethical to do, children who ar made with specific genes atomic number 18 produced for one specific reason and it is to garter early(a) person medically in other words they are made for existence spare for the specific person.In my sisters keeper a book astir(predicate) a little girl who was a genetically modified to help her dying sister from cancer for 12 years she was used as a spare for her sister and when they wanted to restrain a kidney, she took matter in her let hands and sued her parents for emancipation. So it is not moral or right to bring a person ju st to be spare. Although other people will contravene and say that by doing so they are providence vitals, but they don t forecast of the lives they are destroying .Gene modifying is not a coulomb% accurate, it has many mishaps one of the mishaps is a inveterate disease which happened in 2001 at a reproductive facility in in the buff jersey were thirty babies who are genetically modified and have genes of three different people, two women and a man more or less of these thirty children had turners syndrome and turners syndrome happens to one in very 2500 baby and in thirty babies it slide byred more than twice is alarming. There people contradict that genetic modification has many benefits, standardized it increases polymorphism but what about mutations that occur in the children that born. Are they supposed to live with disabilities because some scientists wanted to play god. What about modifying genes to create a impudently species, are we ready to see a tonic type of s pecies walking around with us, scientists are talking about a new kind of humans that have the outer(prenominal) look of humans and the abilities of animals, do we want a human tiger that may be aggressive and be a hazard to other normal humans?