Comparing the Duke and Angelo in Measure for Measure :: Comparison Compare Contrast Essays

Comparing the Duke and Angelo in Measure for MeasureAngelo and the Duke are akin(predicate) in the following respects they both initially claim opposition to love and later come up to be affected by it to strike ends they desire, both manipulate others into situations those others would non willingly choose to be in both have sought to maintain a particular report card they both spend much of the play seeming other than what they push through both think themselves to be other than what they are in the first base and both claim to value a life aloof.The Duke says Believe not that the dribbling dart of love / Can pierce a pass with flying colors bosom (1.3.2-3). Angelo said, Ever till now, / When men were fond, I smiled and wondered how (2.2.185-186). The Duke asks Isabella to marry him by the endwhich isnt necessarily proof of love, however.The play begins with the Duke manipulating Angelo to weed the feebleness of the people (3.2.258), and to see what our seemers be (1.3.58 ). The Duke has reason to believe that Angelo will strictly enforce laws that the Duke had neglected to enforce (1.3.50-53). We have already seen how Angelo manipulates Isabella. The Dukes manipulation, he believes, will bring order to his people without him personally having to be sensed a tyrant, And yet my nature never in the fight / To do it slander (1.3.42-43). Angelo, too, has taken pride in maintaining a particular reputation. The Dukes great concern about world slandered suggests he has a little than complete bosom, showing a lack of self-knowledgeanother feature share by Angelo.The Duke manipulates others in part by using a conceal. Angelo, too, comes to affair a disguise (2.4.12-15 2.4.153-156). In addition, the Duke has ever loved the life removed (1.3.8), which sounds similar to Angelos reputation for austerity.The differences between the Duke and Angelo are far greater, however, depending on the reading the play is given (All the perspectives I mention below come from Levers Introduction). It is possible to interpret the Duke as being more a stage device than a full-fledged character. His primeval role may be to represent the middle way that acceptable rulers should adopt, and to orchestrate the trials and learning experiences that move the other characters from their extreme positions into more naturalise ways of being. The Duke does this by implementing the historic ruse of going in disguise among his people to find out how things are really going, and to set them sort out if need be.